<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Most Awesome	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.elearningworld.org/most-awesome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.elearningworld.org/most-awesome/</link>
	<description>For the online learning world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:29:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Stuart Mealor		</title>
		<link>https://www.elearningworld.org/most-awesome/#comment-155</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Mealor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearningworld.org/?p=2188#comment-155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.elearningworld.org/most-awesome/#comment-153&quot;&gt;Nadav Kavalerchik&lt;/a&gt;.

Good input Nadav.
I’m not sure how soon sites will be using http2 - it’s only the last year or so that there has been a big increase in https for the ‘average’ website.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.elearningworld.org/most-awesome/#comment-153">Nadav Kavalerchik</a>.</p>
<p>Good input Nadav.<br />
I’m not sure how soon sites will be using http2 &#8211; it’s only the last year or so that there has been a big increase in https for the ‘average’ website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stuart Mealor		</title>
		<link>https://www.elearningworld.org/most-awesome/#comment-154</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Mealor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearningworld.org/?p=2188#comment-154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fantastic explanation of font awesome and the history of how, when, and where it’s been integrated into Moodle.
Having played around with fontawesome for a while now myself, I think this article is excellent in providing a clear overview for others.
Great stuff Gareth - thanks !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic explanation of font awesome and the history of how, when, and where it’s been integrated into Moodle.<br />
Having played around with fontawesome for a while now myself, I think this article is excellent in providing a clear overview for others.<br />
Great stuff Gareth &#8211; thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nadav Kavalerchik		</title>
		<link>https://www.elearningworld.org/most-awesome/#comment-153</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nadav Kavalerchik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elearningworld.org/?p=2188#comment-153</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As always... funny how it all make sense when giving an examples with Trains ;-)

From a technical pov, Font Awesome seems useful as all the glyphs come together in one file and get cached. Some designers even love them for their uniform color. But, I like SVG better, as they hold various colors, and can be edited by the developer, even though you end up with lots of files.

Soon, when more and more internet hosting services will support HTTP2, the current technical advantage of sending all the glyphs (the font file) in one piece, will be irrelevant. and maybe SVG will be more popular. my personal wishful thinking.

Reference: https://tracker.moodle.org/browse/MDL-52751]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always&#8230; funny how it all make sense when giving an examples with Trains 😉</p>
<p>From a technical pov, Font Awesome seems useful as all the glyphs come together in one file and get cached. Some designers even love them for their uniform color. But, I like SVG better, as they hold various colors, and can be edited by the developer, even though you end up with lots of files.</p>
<p>Soon, when more and more internet hosting services will support HTTP2, the current technical advantage of sending all the glyphs (the font file) in one piece, will be irrelevant. and maybe SVG will be more popular. my personal wishful thinking.</p>
<p>Reference: <a href="https://tracker.moodle.org/browse/MDL-52751" rel="nofollow ugc">https://tracker.moodle.org/browse/MDL-52751</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
