<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Network fonts	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.elearningworld.org/network-fonts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.elearningworld.org/network-fonts/</link>
	<description>For the online learning world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:37:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gareth Barnard		</title>
		<link>https://www.elearningworld.org/network-fonts/#comment-1947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gareth Barnard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elearningworld.org/?p=19551#comment-1947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.elearningworld.org/network-fonts/#comment-1944&quot;&gt;Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for your comment.  Good question about performance, I think that it depends on specific circumstances.  In that where the client is accessing from in relation to your and Google&#039;s servers, and the reduced workload on your server by not serving the font in the first place, and if Google have faster servers with at a time where they&#039;re not overloaded.  So many factors to consider.  Thus could be quicker or slower.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.elearningworld.org/network-fonts/#comment-1944">Anonymous</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment.  Good question about performance, I think that it depends on specific circumstances.  In that where the client is accessing from in relation to your and Google&#8217;s servers, and the reduced workload on your server by not serving the font in the first place, and if Google have faster servers with at a time where they&#8217;re not overloaded.  So many factors to consider.  Thus could be quicker or slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.elearningworld.org/network-fonts/#comment-1944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 22:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elearningworld.org/?p=19551#comment-1944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s very interesting.
This would appeal to local / client site administrators - as they don&#039;t need to get involved in the back-end of Moodle and server.
As you say, licensing should be taken seriously though.
I also wonder if there is any performance overhead when taking this route ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very interesting.<br />
This would appeal to local / client site administrators &#8211; as they don&#8217;t need to get involved in the back-end of Moodle and server.<br />
As you say, licensing should be taken seriously though.<br />
I also wonder if there is any performance overhead when taking this route ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
